Originally posted by djrlewis[..]
Quite so. Really, what was all the fuss about? Kiera's bush I think.
Originally posted by djrlewis[..]
Quite so. Really, what was all the fuss about? Kiera's bush I think.
. The book is much better. Originally posted by yuri31Has anyone seen movie Eragon? What a crap
Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
Yeah, it's shite lol.
I Am Legend. Despite what Gerard said, tis a great film in my opinion
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
In really enjoyed I Am Legend but i'll never watch it again after reading the book. . same with Lord Of The Rings
Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
Yeah, it's shite lol.
I Am Legend. Despite what Gerard said, tis a great film in my opinion
Originally posted by germcevoy[..]
In really enjoyed I Am Legend but i'll never watch it again after reading the book. . same with Lord Of The Rings
Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
Ah, fair kop - LOTR, THE BEST ever adaptation was the radio series with Ian Holm as Frodo etc. Beat the shit out of the films and was uberly faithful to the book. The books weren't bad either lol...
Originally posted by djrlewis[..]
But, in fairness, the films would have been 12 hours king, each!!
As they stand at between 3 and 4 it's long enough. I think they're corking.
Originally posted by yuri31[..]
The Two Towers are fuckin' boring to read imho.
Originally posted by WojBhoy[..]
I definitely think they're good either way, don't get me wrong, great to sit down of an evening and watch with *alcoholic beverages* and peanuts lol, BUT if you know the books inside out, you should know which one is better
Originally posted by djrlewis[..]
The books are unbeatable, period. But they offer different things.
BTW - rewatched Matrix Reloaded the other day. I think this film gets an unfair kicking. I love it.