1. Are you doing the video as well, Nate?
  2. Originally posted by haytrainAre you doing the video as well, Nate?


    No. I've seen it, but it's been a while.
  3. Good review Nate! I'll post mine Friday. Heard the first two songs and the sound is indeed blurry. Gonna tweak it a bit, see what the result will be.
  4. Originally posted by MWSAHGood review Nate! I'll post mine Friday. Heard the first two songs and the sound is indeed blurry. Gonna tweak it a bit, see what the result will be.


    it doesnt need remastered. We obviously have a higher generation copy of the audio. A fresh DVD rip would be the best cure
  5. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    it doesnt need remastered. We obviously have a higher generation copy of the audio. A fresh DVD rip would be the best cure


    Ofcourse...totally forgot that!
  6. Originally posted by MWSAH[..]

    Ofcourse...totally forgot that!


    thats the only downside of having mp3's. We don;t know who's had hold of them before they ended up on here so although many shows on here sound below par, the original files probably sound much much better.
  7. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    thats the only downside of having mp3's. We don;t know who's had hold of them before they ended up on here so although many shows on here sound below par, the original files probably sound much much better.


    A shame really...We can get some of time trough U2Torrents and stuff, but most of them just vanished I think, don't they?
  8. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    thats the only downside of having mp3's. We don;t know who's had hold of them before they ended up on here so although many shows on here sound below par, the original files probably sound much much better.


    Don't get Gerard started on lossless!!!
  9. Originally posted by MWSAH[..]

    A shame really...We can get some of time trough U2Torrents and stuff, but most of them just vanished I think, don't they?


    they only stay on the tracker for so long and when they are gone we have to wait for a reseed. I'd love to have everything on here as 192kbps with full lineage but with 1000+ bootlegs it just ain't gonna happen.
  10. Originally posted by haytrain[..]

    Don't get Gerard started on lossless!!!


    i'm still not a big fan of it. I like studio lossless and the occasional bootleg but for most, anything over 128 will do
  11. Originally posted by germcevoy[..]

    i'm still not a big fan of it. I like studio lossless and the occasional bootleg but for most, anything over 128 will do


    I actually never use it because it's so darn big...a simple gig would be loads of MB or even GB. My laptop doesn't have that much space, the main PC does though.
  12. Originally posted by MWSAH[..]

    I actually never use it because it's so darn big...a simple gig would be loads of MB or even GB. My laptop doesn't have that much space, the main PC does though.


    I couldn't handle all my bootlegs in lossless. No way. Just a few select ones and all the studio stuff