DIG
Active topics
  1. Originally posted by Risto:Woow that one is nice! Nokia always had decent cams on their flagships The N95 was used in comparison in lots of reviews.


    This camera is insanely good. If only I was a decent photographer
  2. There are some great apps on the market. Using experimental algorithms they can produce less blurry images in low light. App using these for the n900 (sure there are Symbian alternatives):
    http://blessn900.com/

    Really worth having an app like that, so try finding one!
  4. And another. Still trying to work out how to take a good picture. This one isn't too bad given the low light foggy conditions. The N8 also packs a smashing photo editor that I have yet to try.

    Invalid url 'http://[IMG]http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/3721/041220100892.jpg[/IMG]'
  5. Nice one!
  6. Not bad at all! When watched at full resolution, the photo looks clearly "phony" (meaning that you can obviously tell it was taken with a mobile phone and not with a professional camera) but the quality is outstanding, I wouldn't have done better with my Nikon CoolPixL16... ***thinks about getting a new camera for Xmas***
  7. Originally posted by LikeASong:Not bad at all! When watched at full resolution, the photo looks clearly "phony" (meaning that you can obviously tell it was taken with a mobile phone and not with a professional camera) but the quality is outstanding, I wouldn't have done better with my Nikon CoolPixL16... ***thinks about getting a new camera for Xmas***


    The camera is that good. Just working out how to use it. I think imageshack is slightly compressing too even though i'm telling it not too. Here's a close up :

    Invalid url 'http://[IMG]http://img834.imageshack.us/img834/7264/04122010080.jpg[/IMG]'
  8. Pretty amazing....camera phones have come a LONG ways in the past 4 or 5 years...


  9. Definitely, some of my phone pics (N8's cam is definitely better though)





    Some things look blurry because they are HDR shots, 3 shots combined into one to capture more of the dynamic range. So if an object moves between the shots it aint looking good Absolutely no other post processing from my part.

  10. Originally posted by Risto:[..]

    Definitely, some of my phone pics (N8's cam is definitely better though)

    [image]

    [image]

    Some things look blurry because they are HDR shots, 3 shots combined into one to capture more of the dynamic range. So if an object moves between the shots it aint looking good Absolutely no other post processing from my part.




    N900? Very nice. I'm looking at getting some sort of an attachment for attempted macro shots.
  11. I think i know what you mean, those addon lenses? For macro shots it looks pretty hard to keep the cam still when its not sunny.
  12. Originally posted by Risto:I think i know what you mean, those addon lenses? For macro shots it looks pretty hard to keep the cam still when its not sunny.


    That's the ones. A mini tripod type thing would be required. Got focus fairly close to this icy flower. Seriously just taking pics of anything now :

    Invalid url 'http://[IMG]http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/9450/06122010108.jpg[/IMG]'
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.