Originally posted by yeah:If Bono says early 2009, it's gonna be November.
Would be nice to know what is the real reason behind all this.
Originally posted by Remy:Bono just confirmed on U2.com that it's gonna be early 2009 when we first hear the songs.. It's gonna be early 2009 though.
[..]
Originally posted by MWSAH:Finally some real news. It seems they're really on fire lately...50-60 songs isn't bad at all. Agree with Gerard, loads of B-sides coming...And I hope it won't be a double album, that just sucks. RHCP did the same with Stadium Arcadium. Good songs on these discs, but if they had put all the good songs on one CD, they would have had the album of the year title.
I can wait till early 2009...Red Rocks is coming, UABRS...no need to be impatient.
Originally posted by thefly07:[..]
lol....sounds like they're not done, the muse is too strong apparently![]()
Originally posted by yeah:[..]
To me this rather sound like they were more or less done with most tracks but weren't happy with the result.
Originally posted by yeah:[..]
To me this rather sound like they were more or less done with most tracks but weren't happy with the result.
Originally posted by AllBecauseOfU2:Credit to the band--and McGuine$$--for not rushing it for the Sept. 30 Grammy-eligibility deadline. Keep plugging away, boys.![]()
Originally posted by thefly07:[..]
at first i was a bit disappointed but now i'm ready, ready for what's next
![]()
Originally posted by thefly07:[..]
Bono actually stated that was pretty much the reason for the delay for Atomic Bomb.....this to me sounds like they just want to keep working, rather than essentially start over......i remember reading something on @U2 about Bono throwing some demo tapes in the trash can because he was so pissed.....he sounds elated to me![]()