Originally posted by Mr_TrekNobody's excusing the guy. But the GK's behavior isn't acceptable either. Even if it's understandable to a degree.
+1
Originally posted by Mr_TrekNobody's excusing the guy. But the GK's behavior isn't acceptable either. Even if it's understandable to a degree.
Originally posted by MacStripey:
you don't need to build up a prison-like something to keep (drunk) people from running on the field. it's easily done with a ditch (word?) between visitors and field. works fine everywhere. why not in Amsterdam? next time someone gets seriously injured on the field. who excuses the poor attacker then?
Originally posted by Mr_Trek:The thing is. The overly-excessive violence from the GK is not excusable either. He could've easily just tackled the guy to the ground and held him there 'til security arrived one second later.
Originally posted by iTim:
Nobody has defended the fan, his actions in today's game are frowned upon but at the same time, nobody should be defending the goalkeeper for his vile actions.
Originally posted by MacStripey:[..]
[..]
then I misunderstood you guys to some extend. Apologies![]()
![]()
Originally posted by clover68[..]
no probs at all![]()
Olof expressed quite wel lwhat is my opinion too.
the guy is definetely to be condemned and should pay what he deserves but the player, in a different manner, too. like Tim said, he also has sort of role-model not only for young players but for youngs in general (and for lots of oldies of course) .. his reaction could trigger an even bigger one among agitated fans.
saying an extreme we're not in the Far West where everyone can make justice by himself
![]()
Originally posted by clover68:saying "i would do the same of the player" doesn't mean it's right![]()
probably i would in the same situation, who knows, but it shouldn't be the right thing to do, i would be wrong too![]()