1. To be honest: I'm pretty sure there's nothing wrong with safety. I felt perfectly safe in there back in 1993. Stadium hasn't changed and no-one's going to make me believe the construction got tired suddenly in 1998.

    It's just some experts did some research and reported that there might be some danger. Because of that, major acts won't take any risk although they did it in the nineties without any problem simply because the report didn't exist back then. Sad.

    Anyway and ontopic again: I will be heading to Brussels anyway.
  2. My friend talked to one of the truck drivers in Zagreb and he said that U2 will be back to Europe next year, but that they'll do indoor shows.
  3. wishful thinking.

    unless indoor means stadiums with a roof.


  4. I don't see the sense of stadiums-with-roof tour leg. : )))


  5. Me neither. That's why I say indoor shows are wishful thinking.
    As much as I would love to see them doing arena's again, I doubt that they've built the Claw for 44 shows only. Also, most of the rumoured locations for 2010 don't have an indoor location that's big and modern enough to hold a U2 gig.
    But I'd love to be wrong.

    On another note: RTL Television reported about a possible St. Petersburg concert next year.


  6. That'd be interesting...


  7. Yep, I'd probably skip all other shows to be there. Breathtaking city from what I've seen.
  8. U2 and Russia? Nah...
  9. i'd go to Russia. Would love to see them in a country they've never played


  10. Me too, atmosphere would be great. Everyone loving songs like Pride, never heard before.
  11. I wouldn't mind a confirmed St Petersburg date. Flights arent that expensive