1. U2 are about to create a “digital visual co-efficient” for album sleeve artwork. “Watch this space because it’s something U2 are addressing on their next album.”


  2. That sounds like a bunch of gobbledy gook, maybe they're talking about a digital cover that changes in Itunes or something.

    But there is an off chance that the physical album cover is holographic or something. Though it doesn't look that way from the pic.
  3. The ony thing about the cover that pisses me off is that Anton could have done it just as good, if not better
  4. Originally posted by gwiz:The ony thing about the cover that pisses me off is that Anton could have done it just as good, if not better


    Bomb was hardly a stunner and Anton has this movie with his name on it so....
  5. And photographs for the book...
  6. just found this in @u2 http://forum.atu2.com/index.php/topic,1014.0/topicseen.html

    Originally posted by [urlhttp://12kblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/u2-album-cover/[/url]
    [image]

    [ LEFT= Richard Chartier & Taylor Deupree / RIGHT = U2 ]

    ok, come on people (meaning, U2/et al.) do some research before you release an album cover….

    for those who don’t know what i’m ranting about, U2’s forthcoming album “no line on the horizon” is nearly an exact rip-off of mine and richard chartier’s “specification.fifteen” which came out a couple of years ago. both covers feature a photograph by Japanese photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto. “specification.fifteen” was created directly in conjunction with Sugimoto and his retrospective at the Hirshhorn Museum in Washington DC. so.. before you let people run off about how “cool” the new U2 cover is.. show them ours first…

    (i like how their small boxes are nearly identical in proportion to ours as well…)



    what do you think????
  7. that's uncool.... wonder if we get an explanation...
  8. They should be honored that U2 used it



    Edit: nice avatar Dieder
  9. Well, shit happens.

    Imagine what would be going on here if that happened to Coldplay.