Originally posted by U2Freak999:I used a Low/High-Pass-Filter to reduce the Tics. I think the M!les source is better than the voynet-source (both Days). It's too bad, that the voice in the iem's is so low. But sounds great, i think?
Originally posted by JuJuman:Why aren't U2 selling at a (very) low price professional recordings of their shows?
Originally posted by U2Freak999:I used a Low/High-Pass-Filter to reduce the Tics. I think the M!les source is better than the voynet-source (both Days). It's too bad, that the voice in the iem's is so low. But sounds great, i think?
Originally posted by hoserama:[..]
So basically you're just stripping the low and highs leaving only the midrange from the IEM?
That can work for an Adam feed although still less than optimal. Especially considering its from a very low end receiver, which already puts out a poor sounding feed. Adam has a different click sound than the rest of the band, and his click is mostly in the 3-6k range, so taking out those ranges can take out most of the click from his. However, he's still not using his feed for Bono's vocals.
And if your brother likes that sound more than the pasadena mix, then we've all got our own ears for things.
Originally posted by U2Freak999:My brother likes the sound more than the Paradena-Wireless-Matrix from sharbear.But anyway i'll stop the work on this definitive. I give up. Thanks for your comments.
![]()
Originally posted by thebonodrums:[..]
can you please post streets from this? PLEASE?!?!?!
Originally posted by U2Freak999:[..]
Sorry, No. I stoped the work on it and deleted the Files. I only have the IEM's yet. But you can download the IEM's on U2torrents.
Originally posted by thebonodrums:[..]
can you post just the plain ole IEM of streets then?