REC
Active topics
  1. Originally posted by Risto:
    About the lossy / lossless stuff.... I dont take part in it (anymore) if it says lossless only I just upload the lossy. Why care about 1 of 2000 bootlegs? Nobody who notices one less boot in lossy.

    On another note: I would switch to lossless files DIRECTLY if they were properly tagged and named though. I am not going to have all files twice to seed and to play.


    The taper does. And reacts. But then again, who cares? We have tons of "great" ecm 719 recordings available for everyone.

    I don't need tags or names. Track 01-25 is enough for me. But, I mostly listen to music at home, on the old Onkyo System, don't care about covers and store my stuff in old shoe boxes. Maybe I'm not freaky enough. Or maybe too freaky?
  2. I said, one less lossy boot. I dont upload lossy boots (anymore) if the taper says so. Learned that nobody cares if they are missing.

    And the tagging / naming sucks, i can live with the U2 - yyyy-mm-dd - Location -Taper info stuff. But half of them just names them U2 2010 or U2 Washington. Also it is not doable to have a decent organised library without tags.

    Maybe i just like things to neat... Seriously doubt that when i look at the stuff around me though
  3. So is this the best possible version of the Washington 92 concert? Or does the TV broadcast have better sound quality?
  4. ---------------------------------
  5. Originally posted by Risto:I said, one less lossy boot. I dont upload lossy boots (anymore) if the taper says so. Learned that nobody cares if they are missing.

    And the tagging / naming sucks, i can live with the U2 - yyyy-mm-dd - Location -Taper info stuff. But half of them just names them U2 2010 or U2 Washington. Also it is not doable to have a decent organised library without tags.

    Maybe i just like things to neat... Seriously doubt that when i look at the stuff around me though


    It sometimes helps to read carefully. Sorry for the misinterpretation.

    I guess the tagging thing is a matter of taste...

    Back to the remaster: Would you guys rate it "better" than Adam Grayer's effort?
  6. ----------------------------------
  7. Originally posted by yeah:[..]

    It sometimes helps to read carefully. Sorry for the misinterpretation.

    I guess the tagging thing is a matter of taste...

    Back to the remaster: Would you guys rate it "better" than Adam Grayer's effort?


    No problem

    Dont have Adam Grayer's version though Or is that the dreamoutloud version?


  8. I did. Sounds a little too muffled, so I'll pass. Thanks for the effort, though.
  9. ------------------------------------


  10. That's all music..a matter of taste.
    And that's why I love it. A world of 6 billion U2-geeks would be boring as hell.
  11. this is the best Zoo tv show for me
    quality of sound is not like from Sydney or Dublin
    but performance is the best
  12. Originally posted by ksx:this is the best Zoo tv show for me
    quality of sound is not like from Sydney or Dublin
    but performance is the best



    I tend to agree here. They played both SBS and Bad which was a rarity on this tour. Too bad Bono butchered the end of One.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.
U2start is run by fans for fans. Help us reduce personal costs. Consider to make a donation to support us.