Originally posted by BelgianBono:[..]
Me too![]()
Has probably something to do with the Dutch language or so![]()
Jep. But not all languages can be so cool

Originally posted by BelgianBono:[..]
Me too![]()
Has probably something to do with the Dutch language or so![]()
Originally posted by u2opra:I love the Dutch language.![]()
Originally posted by djrlewis:[..]
Sadly, I've read all yourtwitteringsposts and fully understand youridiocycontext.
You're still talking out of your arse and actually end up contradicting yourself in that post , which is quite amusing.
They may well have laid down a mastered version of EBW as it was heard by Q Magazine and others.
But they didn't release it and have obviously decided to re-visit it. Ergo, it is a work in progress. Given that arrangements of released tracks can still be drastically re-worked for live performance, they too are still works in progress.
The Every Breaking Wave that the vast majority of the public have heard is a work in progress. End of.
PS Sergio - I know, and yes, I had the same shivers as well![]()
Originally posted by Shimitz:btw the Eno's board says "EVERY BREAKING WAVE (4:13)". so i guess it's not a 6 minute long atnhem as someone metioned before...
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
You are a pocket full of sunshine, I think that sentence was one of the few generally accepted.
Originally posted by BelgianBono:[..]
Don't want to be annoying but... That's not very polite is it...
Originally posted by vanquish:[..]
I am simply saying that there was a finished version of EBW - you yourself have agreed with this.
I take issue with the fact that U2.com is presenting EBW as a new tune which is only in acoustic form.
I highly doubt (though it is possible) that they've throw out all the layers of synth etc reportedly on the 'finished' track and started from scratch again but it is far more likely that they're just playing it in acoustic form for the moment, playing their new songs live seems to have been quite a spontaneous decision so they likely haven't had time to work with all the backing tracks required to replicate the studio version.
This is why the Edge's guitar is so boring, he's just playing very basic arpeggiated chords and not an actual guitar line, like he would in the studio version. I highly doubt that
U2.com has been known to be reporting information incorrectly before so it is quite possible, that the writer of that piece don't know the history of the song and are assuming it to be acoustic work in progress.
Originally posted by djrlewis:[..]
This could go on for ever. I agree with your last 3 paragraphs. Let's leave it at that.
Originally posted by BonoIsTheMessiah: It's a catchy, straight-up rock 'n' roll single, like Elevation, Vertigo, All Because of You, or GOYB.
Originally posted by BonoIsTheMessiah:
North Star seems to me to have the most potential if it is polished up and finished and Bono doesn't use the phrase "space cowboy."