1. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:Tell yah what. He'll do it when Obama specifies what he meant by having more flexibilty in his next term, relaeases the documents from Fast and Furious, and admits, that the reason that his admin lied about the Benghazi incident, was because gave him an excuse to suprese the speech of the religious right, one of his biggest critics.

    So only if Obama says what you want him to? Maybe there could be a different truth.

    I don't like the Fast And Furious thing, but it was funny to see the different reactions from Fox when it was a Republican using executive privilege and when it was a Democrat. On one they said "we have to trust the state to keep some secrets for our sake".
  2. Your blameing fox too change the subject. I disprove of executive privilage in 90% of situations regardless.
  3. I said I didn't like the Fast And Furious thing. I like transparency in government. To me though, Obama is the least bad option of Romney and him. I'm not overly fond of Obama, but there's too much ultraconservative stupidness coming out of the Republican party. The thing that I'm most afraid of is probably a war with Iran, which I feel there would be a greater risk of with a Romney presidency. It would probably be one long horrible war which would make the unpopular wars in Afghanistan and Iraq look like nothing in comparison. The politicians have a responsibility to tell the truth about what that war would probably really mean.
  4. Yeah, well I'm voting for Romney, and there aint a thing you can do about it.
  5. -retracted-

  6. the definition of a closed mind ladies and gentleman!
  7. Well that's not fair, it is not as someone could easily change an Obama voter into a Romney voter. That is the problem of the two party system, there are two 'extremes'. Most people will never change party, the few percent who does decides the election.
  8. I don't think it's a small percentage anymore. Specially with the global crisis and the whole stuff that's going on, a lot of voters will choose the party that's not in charge at the moment just to "punish" the current one, but not because they like the other party better.
  9. Doubt if it is more than 20%, can be proven wrong though

  10. I wouldn't call 20% a small percentage I agree with that figure. I was thinking of 15-25% really.
  11. Still 80 % who will never change their vote.