Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:
Why do most of you seem to think that Sarajevo was one of the best concerts U2 has ever done?
i didn't mean Sarajevo was the best show thay ever played; it was an event not only a musical show and it is a milestone as i said in U2 career.
like others in their history; live aid .. i don't think it was their best acts .. but here it is .. another event .. milestone. there are Bad played much better than live aid.
in my personal experience Turin, not of last year but 2001, was one of my best and Bono voice was definitely not at its best.
i don't think at a show only if one song is played perfect .. i don't think a U2 concert is simply a list of songs .. U2 concerts are much more .. and that is one of many things that makes the difference between them and the others.
ridiculous or not.
if you take care only at the technical musical performance well ok you're right.
i judge one show considering other things too.
(i don't know if i can make me understand with my bad english
) 
Sarajevo is an important concert for the history of U2 (and so is Red Rocks, Live Aid, Superbowl '02 etc), one that shouldn't be forgotten, but it's not a great concert. Red Rocks, Live Aid and Superbowl are great, but except for Red Rocks they shouldn't be on a best U2 gigs list.
