1. you mean the right thanks to which some wackos can get a gun without any problems and then they go to schools and kill innocent students? not very good right imo I don't think it's good if anyone can get a gun
  2. Originally posted by yuri31:[..]

    you mean the right thanks to which some wackos can get a gun without any problems and then they go to schools and kill innocent students? not very good right imo I don't think it's good if anyone can get a gun


    If someone wants a gun, they'll probally find a way too get it anyway. At least you can try too regulate them this way.


  3. There is a difference tho...if it is illegal not everyone can get one...a kid can't find a gun in his father's closet and shoot someone with it. Yes, the criminals and those really looking for it can still find it, but at least we avoid such situations.
  4. As long as the cirminals can get a gun, I want one to defend myself and my family.

    Theives do not break into homes if they might get shot doing so...and if a kid finds a gun in daddy's closet, it may be harsh, but that's daddy's fault - plain and simple.

    If you look at the history of gun control laws in the US, violent crime has risen over the years as gun control laws have become more strict.


  5. Ok, here it is:

    Part 1/4 -

    Part 2/4 -

    Part 3/4 -

    Part 4/4 -


    As I said before, in the film are talking Les Robertson (WTC Structural Engineer), Frank A. Damartini (Manager, WTC Construction), Aaron Swirsky (WTC Arhitect) and many others. People with name and surname, not some nameless bollocks.




  6. And how do we know that this is,

    A. Unbiased.
    B. That the footage hasent been doctored in any way.
  7. Originally posted by Ali709:[..]

    There is a difference tho...if it is illegal not everyone can get one...a kid can't find a gun in his father's closet and shoot someone with it. Yes, the criminals and those really looking for it can still find it, but at least we avoid such situations.


    The situation you described sounds like an accidential shooting. People get killed in car accidents too. Does that mean cars should be illigial?
  8. Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:[..]

    The situation you described sounds like an accidential shooting. People get killed in car accidents too. Does that mean cars should be illigial?


    the main use of cars is transport, but the main use of guns is hurting people (even if it is in self defense). That's what makes the difference...you can't compare guns to other stuff, their use is limited...

    And the situation I described didn't just refer to accidental stuff...what about a kid/teenager who finds the gun, takes it to school, to the park, wherever and starts shooting people for the 'fun' of it...I hear lots of these stories...
  9. Originally posted by Ali709:[..]

    the main use of cars is transport, but the main use of guns is hurting people (even if it is in self defense). That's what makes the difference...you can't compare guns to other stuff, their use is limited...

    And the situation I described didn't just refer to accidental stuff...what about a kid/teenager who finds the gun, takes it to school, to the park, wherever and starts shooting people for the 'fun' of it...I hear lots of these stories...



    1. Guns have many other uses including hunting, target shooting, and collecting.
    2. A car is a deadly weapon as well. If I got pissed off, and decided to kill someone, I would probally find it easir too run them over than blow there brains out.


  10. And how do you know that all "official" statements weren't:

    A. biased.
    B. doctored in any way.

    ??


  11. Everything you know is wrong


  12. Exactly. What I'm trying to say and what ZooTV was saying is that in its core, world is different then the picture we see, picture that is served to us.