Originally posted by zooTV4all:[..]
Why/ how will they do that? I only mean that NLOTH2 is speeded up. The album version is not like that (too slow it seems in comparasion, me thinks).
For me, and I'm sure I'm not alone on this, GOYB seems much longer than it's acctually is. 3 minutes would have been more than enough. NOLTH2 is a much more fresch sounding song and is by far better. 4 minutes but feels like 2½.![]()
Boots 5.5/10
NL2 7.5/10
Originally posted by yeah:[..]
flowerchild, Yogi... your turn!
Originally posted by AAV711:Anyone know where I could hear either or both versions of NLOTH? Should this be done by PM?
Originally posted by APOED:Listened to NLOTH2 yesterday maybe 3-4 times and my reaction afterward was kind of "Blah." Then, I played it again today just for the heck of it, and am astounded. Holy crap, this is good! I already think it's better than ANYTHING on HTDAAB and it's only a B-side. I can't wait to hear the new album now, because I can't stop listening to this. I must've played it like 20 times in a row now, and I still can't stop. I'd feel pretty weird about saying that normally, but seeing how this is a U2 forum, I think that others could probably understand this behavior somewhat, lol. :-)
Originally posted by dieder:NLOTH has restarted to grow on me again... great song. I'm not gonna give any marks so... but GOYB is slightly better imo.