Originally posted by Alex:U2 use far too many playback tracks nowadays to be considered a real "live" band to me, they just perform extraordinary shows. In between all the prerecorded samples there's not much room for interaction and improvisation which I consider essential. A modern U2 gig to me is more a show than a live concert. Back in the Red Rocks and Live Aid days they were mountain movers.
Neal Morse absolutely blew me away with his dutch prog band last year. Big Country were among the best when Stuart Adamson was still alive, and so were the Alarm before 1991. I'm sad to admit that I wasn't impressed with the Page&Plant tour. Bruce Springsteen was impressing when I saw him play for almost 4 hours. Wishbone Ash have to be thrown in, they are a really great force live. I've not yet seen Frank Marino's band Mahogany Rush myself, but their live records are out of this world. The very top spot has to be occupied by either Cream or Jimi Hendrix' Band of Gypsies I'd guess.
A few other extraordinary live bands have already been mentioned.
Alex
Originally posted by Alex:U2 use far too many playback tracks nowadays to be considered a real "live" band to me, they just perform extraordinary shows. In between all the prerecorded samples there's not much room for interaction and improvisation which I consider essential. A modern U2 gig to me is more a show than a live concert. Back in the Red Rocks and Live Aid days they were mountain movers.
Originally posted by Alex:U2 use far too many playback tracks nowadays to be considered a real "live" band to me, they just perform extraordinary shows. In between all the prerecorded samples there's not much room for interaction and improvisation which I consider essential. A modern U2 gig to me is more a show than a live concert. Back in the Red Rocks and Live Aid days they were mountain movers.
Originally posted by NLOTH_Victor:[..]
Alex, I disagree on this....I have been to two U2 concerts recently (Vertigo 2005) and it´s not like they don´t sing and use playback tracks....they do sing and play and improvise (Love is Blindness in Argentina, Who´s Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses in Chicago, Angel of Harlem just hours ago in Berlin)....What they use is normal stuff to add to the performance because they are a four member band and it is hard to translate all the studio sounds to live performances well...They do have a backstage keyboard player that plays during walk on, breathe and city of blinding lights mainly because Edge is on the guitar.... Other than that they use effects for synths that are activated by the Edge...just type in youtube Dallas Schoo (U2´s guitar tech), in the vids he shows how the Edge does some stuff like in ISHFWILF from Elevation 2001 synths and watch the mistaken One from the first night of U2360 and pay attention to how when edge stops the strings stop. It´s not like they are faking what they play like Madonna did for some songs here in Brazil when she took the microphone away from her mouth and the song kept going......Just posting my opinion..If you have an example of where they use playback...real playback...please post.... I would like to know because I would be disappointed because you pay a ticket to see them, not playback crap...and I am sure bono does not lip synch...and they used some stuff to add up to their performances back then...The Unforgettable Fire´s beggining. Alex, sorry if I was rude...didn´t mean to...just posting what I think.
By the way....I just commented live performances of the band I´ve seen, but I think that the Who and Pink Floyd should be amazing too
Sorry, again, if I was rude
Thanx