1. Originally posted by yeah:[..]

    Frankfurt would be new but not the best choice soundwise. Rumours for Hanover and Munich existed already for this year. Hanover was replaced by Gelsenkirchen, though.
    Other cities that seem to be safe from different rumours are Brussels, Vienna, Copenhagen, Lisbon, Prague


    Would want to add De Kuip to that list..going abroad anyway though.


  2. Everyone wants De Kuip. But it's never ever going to happen because a lot of people want to survive a show, too.



  3. Yeah, heard that before. A shame but safety goes first of course.


  4. What is the issue regarding safety and De Kuip?


  5. With too much noise and people the stadium can break down, it's not very solid. There's a noise limit.
  6. If they dont return to Dublin or Holland next year Brussels is on my list.
  7. Originally posted by Remy:[..]

    With too much noise and people the stadium can break down, it's not very solid. There's a noise limit.


    lol
    We'll all sing very quietly


  8. To be honest: I'm pretty sure there's nothing wrong with safety. I felt perfectly safe in there back in 1993. Stadium hasn't changed and no-one's going to make me believe the construction got tired suddenly in 1998.

    It's just some experts did some research and reported that there might be some danger. Because of that, major acts won't take any risk although they did it in the nineties without any problem simply because the report didn't exist back then. Sad.

    Anyway and ontopic again: I will be heading to Brussels anyway.
  9. My friend talked to one of the truck drivers in Zagreb and he said that U2 will be back to Europe next year, but that they'll do indoor shows.
  10. wishful thinking.

    unless indoor means stadiums with a roof.


  11. I don't see the sense of stadiums-with-roof tour leg. : )))