1. Originally posted by vanquish:From my first listen it sounds like a TERRIBLE album.

    There is way too much hamfisted religious imagery - and the lyrics are absolutely shocking in many places.

    The actual songs sound very similar to each other and most of the melodies aren't that strong, the choruses are in many cases quite weak - especially for The Killers. The instrumentation is very bland and generic too (though I liked the synth line on Only the Young)

    Definitely a massive disappointment - I don't even think I particularly liked a single song. And the fact that I've been listening to The Suburbs for the past month (which is absolutely brilliant) didn't help.

    The Killer's definitely seem to be on the way out, first Day & Age which was not a great album and now this. They're definitely going the other way compared to Arcade Fire or CP etc. which are getting better with each album.


    Can't agree more. Instrumentation is the worst part of it, everything seems to quiet, gray and without any contrast.

    And yes, The Suburbs is brilliant.

  2. Originally posted by Yogi:[..]

    Can't agree more. Instrumentation is the worst part of it, everything seems to quiet, gray and without any contrast.

    And yes, The Suburbs is brilliant.




    Yes, I am waiting to see what my brother says. He is an absolute Killers nut (like seriously he even dresses like Brandon - or tries) and he has been holding off listening to it cos he knows it's going to be bad.

    And for all the people who like it, please don't compare it to Pop, the lyrics are absolutely atrocious and the critics aren't making them up, I mean it's hard to argue with stuff like this:

    [quoteIn the land of old Sonora A shallow river valley cries The summer left her without forgiveness It's mirrored in her children's eyes][/quote]

    WTF How can a valley cry?
    But I guess if you don't care about lyrics (or actually like generic, derivative crap like Taylor Swift) then it's not a big problem (but then, why are you a U2 fan?)

    And aside from lyrics, it doesn't help that the music itself is largely forgettable.
    Very disappointing indeed.

    I think this review does a good job of describing what's wrong with Flamingo:

    Unfortunately, however, even by the standards of someone who famously sang "are we human or are we dancer?", the lyrics have a slightly dashed-off feel and then some. "Heart and pain came pouring down / like hail, sleet and rain, yeah, they're handing it out," is bad enough, but by the time we reach the stuff about the Devil's fiery arrows we're practically in the realm of My First Slightly Goth Poem.

    In fact, the primary problem with much of this record comes from the writing itself. One can appreciate that Flowers' beliefs are enormously important to him (indeed, they've arguably been the one constant in his time in the public eye), but this is his most concerted effort yet to reflect that in his music, what with hallelujahs here, chosen lands there, and allusions of prayer spattered throughout, and, while it's a bold effort, there's plenty in the way of prior work that proves what awkward bedfellows rock and religion can be if you can't apply the gravitas of a Nick Cave or the poetic flair of a Paddy McAloon, and, to be honest, there's a definite sense of overreach here. Moreover, when he's not in testifying mode, Flowers repeatedly attempts to mythologise his – and this'll be that Springsteen affection again – home town, rather bluntly on 'Welcome To Fabulous Las Vegas', with a mixed-results-producing magical realism on 'Jilted Lovers & Broken Hearts', and in confusingly unfocussed fashion on 'Playing With Fire' (the "charcoal veins" bit sort of works, but the "river of truth / fountain of youth" references come unusually unwelcomely from left field).

    ...

    Otherwise, Flamingo is an album horribly hamstrung by its ill-placed predilection for being A Very Important Thing Indeed, whereas what it actually is is a disinteresting folly from someone who's more than capable of full-blown pop excellence if only he'd content himself with biting that particular bullet. He's recovered from similar missteps before, of course, but we can only hope his bandmates steer a wiser course when they reconvene; meanwhile, what remains is an album that's all filler, no Killers.


    http://thequietus.com/articles/04902-brandon-flowers-flamingo-review


    I suggest everyone who thinks it's good go listen to The Suburbs and hear what an imaginitive, innovative, inspired record actually sounds like.

  3. No-one disses Taylor Swift and Brandon Flowers infront of me!

    Flippin' ek cant you just accept that some people might like it and some people dont???????? :

    WTF: in DGPFYCC - how can someone be a baby's fist

    A valley can over-flower and flood
  4. Damn! I really wanted to go to see him in Birmingham but Im at Uni
  5. Completely forgot this album was coming out. I'm downloading it now for my run tonight. Thank god I saw this!!


  6. That is not a zing

    But yes, lines like that are poetry - the thing is they're terrible poetry!

    'Poetry' is not an excuse for things not making sense.
  7. Originally posted by vanquish:[..]

    That is not a zing

    But yes, lines like that are poetry - the thing is they're terrible poetry!

    'Poetry' is not an excuse for things not making sense.


    Explain: "your'e a baby's fist" please...

    and what the hell is 'Zoo Station'
  8. Suburbs is overrated IMO but it's way better than this album. But then again theyre different artists and you can't fully compare one artist to another (U2 vs Coldplay wars are meaningless)

    But yeah i Playing with Fire and Only the Young are amazing. Can't really explain why I love it them soo much
  9. For the record: I love it.


  10. Firstly the 'baby's fist' line in DGPFYCC is a use of metaphor, the valley crying line is anthropomorphism. So your comparison is flawed from the outset.

    As for DGPFYCC, the entire line is:

    A little uptight, you're a baby's fist


    It just is a way of imaginitively describing the subject of the song who is stubborn, spoilt etc by referring to the way baby's are born with clenched fists and don't open them until after a few days/weeks after birth.

    So it's actually quite a good line as it alludes to the character being deceptively cute and innocent (like a baby) but surprisingly stubborn, difficult etc in the same way as a baby's fists are constantly clenched.

    And if you're asking about Zoo Station, I might be wasting my time here as I would've thought anyone who has been a U2 fan for any reasonable length of time would know what the song refers to.