Originally posted by vanquish:Does anyone understand my point? Probably not, but it's quite hard to explain in writing.
Indeed, I get you for sure

Originally posted by vanquish:Does anyone understand my point? Probably not, but it's quite hard to explain in writing.
Originally posted by vanquish:[..]
Yes, sorry I admit I got a bit carried away as u2spear was arguing with me on lyrics in another thread (and I get frustrated with people who don't really know what they're talking about but still try to argue).
;;;;;;;
Does anyone understand my point? Probably not, but it's quite hard to explain in writing.
Originally posted by germcevoy:House Rule 1. Don't bee an annoying dick
Originally posted by dieder:The best part of the studio version is the sort of solo/riff after 'Feelllll noothing!'
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:Or they could just do the original one that most U2 fans well in love with in the first place.
By the way, I know i"m late in asking this, but does anyone have an HQ quality clip of Mercy? (the original recording) I have one on my ipod, but it's an mp3 from youtube and the quality is garbage.
Thanks.
Originally posted by drewhiggins:[..]
http://rapidshare.com/files/5373536/01_-_Mercy.mp3.html
Originally posted by djrlewis:[..]
[..]
Originally posted by Andrew_C:instead of the "because, because, because" part which seems to be turning a lot of people off the new version, they could try sumthing like "just 'cuz we can, it doesnt mean we must"
Originally posted by aussiemofo:Ok I've had a few listens to it and I officially prefer the studio version.
I prefer the studio chorus over the "because, because, because" mantra and I like the binary code lyric that was omitted from live version. And I like the fact that it was a 6 1/2 minute epic ballad.