LIV
Active topics


  1. You'd have to admit that if the tour does go for 4 more years (it won't) you Europeans would try to get as many European legs as possible, and not care about fans in places that do not get to see many U2 concerts. It's already happening now with the 3rd European leg rumors.
  2. Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:[..]

    You'd have to admit that if the tour does go for 4 more years (it won't) you Europeans would try to get as many European legs as possible, and not care about fans in places that do not get to see many U2 concerts. It's already happening now with the 3rd European leg rumors.


    Because it's the European fans who make the tour itinerary. Fuckin hell. . .
  3. Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:[..]

    You'd have to admit that if the tour does go for 4 more years (it won't) you Europeans would try to get as many European legs as possible, and not care about fans in places that do not get to see many U2 concerts. It's already happening now with the 3rd European leg rumors.


    But what do you expect from people from Europe, that they will say:''Yeeeey another US tour'' ?????
  4. Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:[..]

    You'd have to admit that if the tour does go for 4 more years (it won't) you Europeans would try to get as many European legs as possible, and not care about fans in places that do not get to see many U2 concerts. It's already happening now with the 3rd European leg rumors.


    Yeah, but that means North America will get as many legs as we do. You're Australian, only 25 million people live there, so therefore, there isn't much of a demand in Australia as there is in Europe. Roughly, 600 million people live in Europe, so about 24 times more people than Australia has.

    Oh, and I do care about places that do not get (much) concerts. I would really wish that they'd play in Japan, Middle East, Peru etc.
  5. And isn't it so that if I wanted to see an Australian band, I would probably have to travel to Australia all the time to see this band?

    I'm wanting everyone on this globe who wants to see U2 to be able to see them. But don't hold it against me if I'm happy they're playing in my homecountry or somewhere near me.
  6. Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:[..]

    You'd have to admit that if the tour does go for 4 more years (it won't) you Europeans would try to get as many European legs as possible, and not care about fans in places that do not get to see many U2 concerts. It's already happening now with the 3rd European leg rumors.


    Buy a plane ticket. I did.
  7. Originally posted by bobplaysthedrums:[..]

    You'd have to admit that if the tour does go for 4 more years (it won't) you Europeans would try to get as many European legs as possible, and not care about fans in places that do not get to see many U2 concerts. It's already happening now with the 3rd European leg rumors.


    Also, the only people asking are the people asking are the ones who got left out of Europe 2 i.e Ireland, UK and Netherlands. Not looking for a fully fledged cross continent leg. And it's only because of heavy rumours as band members wishes.
  8. EVERYONE HERE WHO IS EUROPEAN IS A BASTARD BECAUSE HE/SHE SCHEDULED U2 IN THEIR COUNTRY. WTFFFF.


    What is with this place lately? Grow up.


  9. You don't get it. They are not bastards for going to U2 concerts, some (not all) are just selfish because they want another European leg when they have already seen it in their country (or just outside it) twice. Some countries haven't seen it at all, and can't or don't want to spend money on plane tickets. 1 leg for each continent is enough.
  10. Originally posted by jofice:[..]

    Also, the only people asking are the people asking are the ones who got left out of Europe 2 i.e Ireland, UK and Netherlands. Not looking for a fully fledged cross continent leg. And it's only because of heavy rumours as band members wishes.


    I've only heard Ireland from the band. If a 3rd European leg it should be just the UK and Ireland.

    And The Netherlands is closer to Belgium, than I am to Canberra, so they didn't really get left out.
  11. Originally posted by JRlovesU2:And isn't it so that if I wanted to see an Australian band, I would probably have to travel to Australia all the time to see this band?


    Usually. Depends how lazy the band is.
  12. Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]

    Yeah, but that means North America will get as many legs as we do. You're Australian, only 25 million people live there, so therefore, there isn't much of a demand in Australia as there is in Europe. Roughly, 600 million people live in Europe, so about 24 times more people than Australia has.


    That's true. But, a lot of Australian's go to concerts. I think AC/DC's recent Australia/NZ tour was seen by 700,000 people. So there is still a lot of demand for some artists.

    Originally posted by KieranU2:
    Oh, and I do care about places that do not get (much) concerts. I would really wish that they'd play in Japan, Middle East, Peru etc.


    They should do play in China, and play Walk On with Aung San Suu Kyi herself (yes I know that she is from Burma, not China but there's no way U2 will be allowed to play there)
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.