1. loathe for me i'm afraid. live performances were as usual excellent. for me it was the dance vibe that weakened the songs. i barely listen to the album.
  2. Pop (album): 3 stars (out of 5)
    Popmart (tour): 4.5 stars (out of 5)

    I very rarely listen to Pop but listen to five Popmart shows (the "typical" five) quite frequently. The songs sound so much better live (as does much of U2's canon) and are stengthened by being played along classics from the '80s and Achtung Baby. The karaoke was a bad idea, however. Thankfully they smartened up and replaced it with that great version of SBS.
  3. Love. The tour was far better than some have given credit.

    Right or wrong, when there is a lot of production and video elements to a show, it doesn't allow for as much spontaneity.


    Someone complained that the setlists didn't change much and Bono's voice was bad.

    Zoo TV setlists didn't vary much. Heck, look at all of the tours... Other than some of the Lovetown and some Joshua Tree shows... the setlists have been 90% set with a few floating songs. U2 have never been like Dave Mattews or Bruce Springsteen

    As for Bono's voice, it was talked about in U2 by U2. He had some sort of allergy issues and the actually reasons were not determined until after the Popmart tour. Since then, his voice has been much better. But that said, I've heard a number of Popmart bootlegs and I went to a handful of Popmart shows. Bono's voice was not horrible.

    If I have one complaint, it is that U2 gave up on "Do You Feel Loved" and "If God Will Send...". And after issues with a fullband arrangement of "Staring at the Sun" on opening night, most if not all of the rest of the dates the tune was turned into a duet. That seemed like a compromise and admit to defeat.

    It is no different than U2 trying and 'not feeling' other songs that got dropped. Whether you go back to Indian Summer Sky, Babyface or as present as No Line On The Horizon and Breathe. For whatever reason, it seems the band 'give up' on some songs. Sometimes only after trying a few times, perhaps feeling they just can do them convincingly live? Sometimes they seem to think/feel that the tunes are not working for the fans.

    But as I said, seems that they do lose their nerve. I am not one that things all U2 do is perfect. But I think much of what they do has been very good. But sometimes it seems they take the criticism too close to heart and then slowly back away. Seems they did that with POP songs during Popmart and with NLOTH songs during 360 tour. If it appears that they have lost faith in tunes... fans might follow suit. I say: Be proud of what you've made -- win or lose.

    I'm sure others will have other points of view. That is just how I have felt about it.

    Interesting part for me... as much as I heard some complain about Pop and Popmart back in 1997... I have heard many, on many forums.... some of those that complained back then... talk of WHY U2 should be playing Discotheque and Mofo on the 360 tour... how it would fit with the motif of the show and the claw.

    I'm pretty sure that 95% of any stadium would pee themselves if U2 played Mofo, Discotheque, Last Night on Earth, full band version of Please and/or Gone.
  4. PRETTY MUCH MY FAVOURITE TOUR, EVER
  5. Originally posted by anstratdubh1979:Love. The tour was far better than some have given credit.

    Right or wrong, when there is a lot of production and video elements to a show, it doesn't allow for as much spontaneity.


    Someone complained that the setlists didn't change much and Bono's voice was bad.

    Zoo TV setlists didn't vary much. Heck, look at all of the tours... Other than some of the Lovetown and some Joshua Tree shows... the setlists have been 90% set with a few floating songs. U2 have never been like Dave Mattews or Bruce Springsteen

    As for Bono's voice, it was talked about in U2 by U2. He had some sort of allergy issues and the actually reasons were not determined until after the Popmart tour. Since then, his voice has been much better. But that said, I've heard a number of Popmart bootlegs and I went to a handful of Popmart shows. Bono's voice was not horrible.

    If I have one complaint, it is that U2 gave up on "Do You Feel Loved" and "If God Will Send...". And after issues with a fullband arrangement of "Staring at the Sun" on opening night, most if not all of the rest of the dates the tune was turned into a duet. That seemed like a compromise and admit to defeat.

    It is no different than U2 trying and 'not feeling' other songs that got dropped. Whether you go back to Indian Summer Sky, Babyface or as present as No Line On The Horizon and Breathe. For whatever reason, it seems the band 'give up' on some songs. Sometimes only after trying a few times, perhaps feeling they just can do them convincingly live? Sometimes they seem to think/feel that the tunes are not working for the fans.

    But as I said, seems that they do lose their nerve. I am not one that things all U2 do is perfect. But I think much of what they do has been very good. But sometimes it seems they take the criticism too close to heart and then slowly back away. Seems they did that with POP songs during Popmart and with NLOTH songs during 360 tour. If it appears that they have lost faith in tunes... fans might follow suit. I say: Be proud of what you've made -- win or lose.

    I'm sure others will have other points of view. That is just how I have felt about it.

    Interesting part for me... as much as I heard some complain about Pop and Popmart back in 1997... I have heard many, on many forums.... some of those that complained back then... talk of WHY U2 should be playing Discotheque and Mofo on the 360 tour... how it would fit with the motif of the show and the claw.

    I'm pretty sure that 95% of any stadium would pee themselves if U2 played Mofo, Discotheque, Last Night on Earth, full band version of Please and/or Gone.


    Nice post. I agree with so many of your comments.

    It would be intersting to see how we would all react to the lack of variation in the Zoo and Pop setlists if we had the communication technology we have today back then. I have a feeling we'd be screaming for something different. It goes to show you how great BOTH of those tours were for their times.
  6. Originally posted by anstratdubh1979:Love. The tour was far better than some have given credit.

    Right or wrong, when there is a lot of production and video elements to a show, it doesn't allow for as much spontaneity.


    Someone complained that the setlists didn't change much and Bono's voice was bad.

    Zoo TV setlists didn't vary much. Heck, look at all of the tours... Other than some of the Lovetown and some Joshua Tree shows... the setlists have been 90% set with a few floating songs. U2 have never been like Dave Mattews or Bruce Springsteen

    As for Bono's voice, it was talked about in U2 by U2. He had some sort of allergy issues and the actually reasons were not determined until after the Popmart tour. Since then, his voice has been much better. But that said, I've heard a number of Popmart bootlegs and I went to a handful of Popmart shows. Bono's voice was not horrible.

    If I have one complaint, it is that U2 gave up on "Do You Feel Loved" and "If God Will Send...". And after issues with a fullband arrangement of "Staring at the Sun" on opening night, most if not all of the rest of the dates the tune was turned into a duet. That seemed like a compromise and admit to defeat.

    It is no different than U2 trying and 'not feeling' other songs that got dropped. Whether you go back to Indian Summer Sky, Babyface or as present as No Line On The Horizon and Breathe. For whatever reason, it seems the band 'give up' on some songs. Sometimes only after trying a few times, perhaps feeling they just can do them convincingly live? Sometimes they seem to think/feel that the tunes are not working for the fans.

    But as I said, seems that they do lose their nerve. I am not one that things all U2 do is perfect. But I think much of what they do has been very good. But sometimes it seems they take the criticism too close to heart and then slowly back away. Seems they did that with POP songs during Popmart and with NLOTH songs during 360 tour. If it appears that they have lost faith in tunes... fans might follow suit. I say: Be proud of what you've made -- win or lose.

    I'm sure others will have other points of view. That is just how I have felt about it.

    Interesting part for me... as much as I heard some complain about Pop and Popmart back in 1997... I have heard many, on many forums.... some of those that complained back then... talk of WHY U2 should be playing Discotheque and Mofo on the 360 tour... how it would fit with the motif of the show and the claw.

    I'm pretty sure that 95% of any stadium would pee themselves if U2 played Mofo, Discotheque, Last Night on Earth, full band version of Please and/or Gone.


    Yeah have to say too , that pretty much sums it up . Dont get me wrong I really liked the tour but it had the potential to be so much more
  7. Love it. They need to forget everything theyve done this decade, go back and progress waht they started on Pop.
  8. POPMART

    Love:
    * The performances (well, the performances after the 1st American leg). What happened to the bad-ass performances of 1989-1998?

    Loathe:
    * The stage design and clothes. I think they took it a bit too far.
    * The man in drag during Lemon Perfecto Mix
  9. Absolutely love Popmart, Pop songs in that set are awesome and sound brilliant


  10. As a concept, yeah- I think the band looked a little ridiculous (especially Adam, I just didn't really get that at all)...but individually, I thought Bono looked awesome as hell boxing up the front of the stage with the huge boxing robe on, then taking it off to reveal the muscle shirt- with the first instance of the colored shades, and the short hair- he looked super cool!

    Edge DID look ridiculous, but its still my favorite Edge-look aside from maybe the Vertigo Tour. Check my avatar His whole look just screamed 'gunslinger guitar cowboy' to me, and I thought it was cool so long as he didn't keep the look around further than the tour

    But I'm totally with you that, as a band, they looked just a bit too goofy together.