Originally posted by clover68:it's a very delicate discussing thing
i'm against any kind of war and civils deaths, and soldier's too. i was against Iraq war, i am against Libia bombing and so on. and i think Bin Laden could be taken without ten years of Afghanistan war.
has Bin Laden got to be keep alive? go and tell to NY, Washington, London, Madrid .. Marrakesh people.
you can say the same for the iraqi people and you're right too .. as i said it's very delicate
i'm against any kind of human being kills .. but there are exceptions that cannot be consider "humans" .. Osama Bin Laden is one them .. like Hitler, Mussolini and some others maybe also one from your ex-country (don't get offended by this, it's definetely not my will; if so sorry)
Yeah, we had Pavelić, Hitler's son of a bitch financed by Mussolini.
But let's go back on topic. Here's the thing: I don't believe in Bin Laden. I don't believe that one guy, one guy was smarter than this:

I think that US just randomly picked one terrorist and said: 'Ok, he's gonna be our ultimate target for the next x number of years. Remember, USA invaded two countries because of that guy.
In order to invade someone or something, you need to have a symbol, someone very bad so that people will say: 'Ok, let's get that bastard no matter what!'.
Iraq: 105.000 dead civilians. Because of one man, or because of this:
