
Originally posted by noiseless:[..]
I partly agree, Pop might be a little confused but I don't think the song selection is a mess that big. Albums after Pop are, in my opinion, a bigger mess in that department.
Originally posted by clover68:damn me i was sleeping during this discussion![]()
![]()
i'd like to say a couople of thing hoping i haven't misunderstood or lost anything.
[..]
uhm from what is my experience they won lots of NEW fans, lots of olders start to take a step back since All that you can't and following with the Bomb
Originally posted by dieder:Popmart Sarajevo. Nuff said.
Originally posted by clover68:anyway Popmart had the best press conference ever![]()
Originally posted by dieder:Popmart Sarajevo. Nuff said.
Originally posted by clover68:damn me i was sleeping during this discussion![]()
![]()
i'd like to say a couople of thing hoping i haven't misunderstood or lost anything.
[..]
uhm from what is my experience they won lots of NEW fans, lots of olders start to take a step back since All that you can't and following with the Bomb
[..]
but what do you mean with U2 releasing a U2 record? i read you said also that with All that you can't they went back to be U2, puttig it near Joshua (this throws me cold shivers down my spine hehe).
maybe i'm going to extreme but .. so Achtung is not a "U2 album"?
and what is the U2 sound? you can't define it precisely .. all over the years they always went through evolution or maybe, saying better, changes ..
first 3 - Unforgettable - Joshua - Achtung and so on .. they built something that cannot be labeled (and it's really hard for me thinking of another band that did that)
i can accept that someone likes All that more than Pop/Achtung/Joshua/Unforgettable .. it's really hard but i can hehehe .. but not that in that album there's the typical U2 sound![]()
Originally posted by clover68:from what i know .. Joshua and Achtung have the same spot here
someone prefer one someone else the other but both on top by far
personally i can hardly say which is my favourite
Originally posted by RUMMY:[..]
I know I should use a larger "sample size" for more statistically significant results but I believe Q Magazine (I'm not too sure what the thoughts are on this publication in this forum - I like it since it's very U2, Radiohead, and Oasis friendly) generally rates AB higher than JT while North America's Rolling Stone magazine seems to give the edge (ha!) to JT in their polls.
Again, just stirring the pot.
Originally posted by EDDMB:[..]
LOL. JT and AB are both brilliant.But,JT made the band mega here in the States.WOWY,ISHFWILF and Steets (of course),are U2s anthems.But,IMO,One is U2s best song (and Bad).