Originally posted by RUMMY:Shit. We're supposed to be talking about a Pop remaster here.
Originally posted by RUMMY:Shit. We're supposed to be talking about a Pop remaster here.
Originally posted by EDDMB:[..]
True.In only 6 years we can get a remaster of PoP,maybe they will give us an entire cd of super duper uber remixes and throw in the live in Mexico DVD that we already have.Can't wait.LOL .....
Originally posted by pleasegone:[..]
CD sales have been going downhill the last 10 years. If any band (U2) included, wants to have some remasters made, the time is now, while the old fans are still willing to buy them. The reason No Line On The Horizon failed was 90% the fact that people just don't buy cds. Maybe 10% was not making "Magnificient" the lead single and some weaker tracks.
And yes, the thread was about Pop, not about The Joshua Tree. There are tons of posts about JT. Yeah, they probably will throw in the Mexico City DVD. If I could choose one, I would pick Sao Paulo if it had to be one. The reason I made a fantasy super duper deluxe version with Las Vegas, Edmonton, etc.. was to show the growth of the tour. Yeah, they probably would be too chicken shit to release Vegas. I have only heard the audio, but despite the mistakes it was great hearing the start of one of my favorite tours.
As far as Pop being a weak album, I think that's crazy. Cashtung Baby is my favorite, with Joshua and Pop right there. Those 3 are the only U2 albums that I don't have to skip a track. I hardly have to skip a track on anything else, but these 3 are the ones that I never have to. U2 had balls when they released Pop. It was only after the backlash that they changed their tune. My heart sunk when I read in Rolling Stone that they considered Pop to be the "hangover" instead of the party. Sad to see an album that they believed in is now in the corner. I find it ironic that they remixed "I'll Go Crazy" to sound like it came from Pop. They simply took a song that sounded like "Walk On's weak cousin," and made it sound like a mediocre Pop outtake.
In conclusion, if you can still find a used CD store, and look at the back of a used Joshua Tree, it has scratches all over it from being played too much. Pick up a copy of Pop, and it is crystal clear. It's hard to judge a cd that you have not listened to. I know some die hards here have listened to it, and still can't get into it...that's fine, but if you have not LISTENED to it (not just heard it), then you need to hear it all the way through 5 times in a month to get a clear picture. It is a truly great album, that will fade away with Hattle & Rum as a throwaway. A shame.
Originally posted by RUMMY:The last two "posters" know their stuff and I respect both opinions. I'm a bit moody when it comes to Pop and its tour. Some days I think it's a diamond in the rough other times I think it's a lump of coal. I do like Leeds and Santiago, however.
Yeah, Radiohead blew it with their last album. However, listen to "The Daily Mail" (in it's entirity) and you might be pleasantly surprised.
Originally posted by EDDMB:[..]
My question to Radiohead ,WTF ?? and where are the guitars ??...Is Ed Obrien still in the band ???
Originally posted by sonia_lastrega:I regard Pop(mart) as one of the cleverest things U2 ever did