Originally posted by ahn1991:If you've paid to see them live, then I think it's totally worth the $50 to have those tracks memorialized.
Originally posted by ahn1991:[..]
After having reread my review, I noticed that I said that the surprise was totally unexpected (you don't say.jpeg).
Anyhow, I'm not going to spoil it because I think it's much better that people hear it themselves. But it's surprising on multiple levels, including the fact that one wouldn't expect to find something like what they did on an official release of any sort.
Originally posted by ahn1991:If you've paid to see them live, then I think it's totally worth the $50 to have those tracks memorialized.
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Can't see the point in that.
I already have perfect quality bootlegs (audio AND video) of the concerts I attended&paid for, and those bootlegs costed me 0 bucks.
I mean, I have already downloaded and listened to U22 (which is absolutely awesome, I won't be the one denying it), and if I could get my hands over a physical copy of the thing it would be great, but it's not like there's a irreplaceable hole in my collection... Nor a 50$ hole in my poor pocket for sure.
Originally posted by Mr_Trek:Fact is that 50 dollars is just an insane price for an album (even though it's a double album).
Go to a nice record store and see how much great music you can pick up for 50 bucks.
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
You aren't paying for a double album. Your album gets you a subscription to U2.com. This is a gift for doing so.
Originally posted by Mr_Trek:[..]
And the subscription to U2.com is just the greatest subscription you could have.
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
I'd agree that it isn't worth the money. How lucky I am that I have a choice as to whether or not to buy it.