Originally posted by fabian:I don't see why you guys are opposing a Western intervention. I mean, something has to happen, regardless who is responsible for those chemical attacks.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-23892594
Originally posted by fabian:[..]
It wasn't torn apart because of the intervention, was it?
Originally posted by fabian:I call bs. Both Libya and Syria are countries that already were torn apart. So far, over 100,000 people died in Syria. I posted that BBC link about an hour ago, here is it again: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-23892594. Innocent people are hurt in a repulsive way. It's our task to help them.
Originally posted by fabian:[..]
That's the only reason why there hasn't been an intervention yet. Meanwhile, people are killed because of these politics.
Originally posted by Risto:Well if you bomb the government you are helping Al-Qaeda and if you bomb Al-Qaeda you help Assad.
The only intervention possible is station 1 mln soldiers there to protect a possible cease-fire. But we all know what happens when we pull those back...
Originally posted by fabian:I like to think we are more civilized now than we were in 1861.