Originally posted by bartajax:Am I the only one is kinda suprised they aren't working with Lanois and Eno at all (at least according to the news we get)?
Was there some kind of a fight?
Originally posted by cesar_garza01:[..]
Maybe both sides considered that the partnership gave everything it was supposed to give and decided to explore different horizons? They certainly kept a good relation. Plus, U2 exhaust their producers with their perfectionism. Probably Lanois just thinks "I'm too old for this s.... stuff".
Originally posted by bartajax:Am I the only one is kinda suprised they aren't working with Lanois and Eno at all (at least according to the news we get)?
Was there some kind of a fight?
Brian Eno (and to a lesser extent Daniel Lanois as well) was underwhelmed -and some even say, annoyed- by the band regarding NLOTH as a "failure" album. I mean, most of the fanbase liked the album but it obviously didn't reach the masses like The Bomb or Leave Behind had done, so the band understood it as a false step. Eno and Lanois obviously didn't like that attitude towards the album they had worked on so hard for years and there were a couple of crossed quotes I can't be arsed searching for 
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Actually "there was", regardless what my forum mates have told you
Originally posted by treasure:I found an article where Eno said he fell out with U2 for a while as he was unhappy that it said Music by U2 under each song on ATYCLB and he felt that he deserved credit for coming up with some of the musical parts. (Sorry I can't copy and paste it as it's a scan of a magazine article).
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Actually "there was", regardless what my forum mates have told you
) Originally posted by u2joost:[..]
I'm with Eno on this....
In NO way NLOTH was a failure album!
(well, except 'Boots' maybe...
