1. Originally posted by ahn1991:I think all of this comes as a byproduct of the mass availability of data in our current society. Because information can be so easily accessed, there is a huge de-emphasis on a person's ability to remember things. Companies and schools are saying that memorizing facts is not as important as being able to navigate the resources to find what you need. In business and academics, this is fine. However, this principle has invaded every aspect of life, even pleasure. Before everything could be easily recorded, information was passed on through oral tradition, by talking about it. This required the ability to accurately remember and recall an event from your own mind. If you think about it, this can only be done by truly experiencing an event. The events you remember best are those you actually took part it. This is coming in conflict with an age where oral tradition has lost its worth. People are looking for concrete proof that an event actually occurred. They want to see a picture or video to prove that you were actually at an event.

    Now we live in a society where people spend more energy memorializing an experience than actually experiencing an experience. That's because they feel that without some sort of concrete proof, their experience cannot be validated by others. But attempts to validate an experience to others comes at the cost of experiencing it for yourself. So now the only memories you had of that concert was how you couldn't decide what filter to use for that picture of Bono.


    Beautiful and true story.
  2. Relevant:

  3. I don't know, things and people evolve along with technology.

    I know that I'm rather weird when it comes to social media, so this doesn't really mean anything, but I don't care about recording anything or taking pictures anymore... because I know someone else is doing it for me.
    The first couple of times I had a smartphone in a concert I was eager to capture on MY phone a video of the guys up front, at least one song... then I realised that it wouldn't look that good anyway, it wasn't as exciting as just enjoying the concert and that by the time I got home there were already a couple of videos uploaded to youtube, so why bother?

    I'd guess people will eventually find out that there's no point in record everything because everything is being recorded anyway.

    And I think bands and venues will also find out that they need to incorporate all this as part of their service if they want to keep in business.
  4. Originally posted by ahn1991:[..]
    "So plan to be there on time — no opening-act cushion!"


    Wow this is pretty amazing! So am I to assume that they will start playing right at 7:30?
    Thats what the fansite @U2 wrote, so that isn't official. But it could be.
  5. Wait. Did they "Confirmed: No Opening Act" or "No Opening Act Confirmed"?
  6. "Live Nation has confirmed that U2 will not have an opening act for the Innocence + Experience tour. It will be "an evening with U2" and only U2"
  7. Bono needs to be in bed at 10
  8. Yeah, sorry. Tim is right.

    But what I meant is that the quote you posted was ''made up'' by @U2.
  9. Hmm...

    I'm trying to go spoiler free, but I think someone should post the actual concert start time in Vancouver so people know what's going on.
  10. Originally posted by ahn1991:Hmm...

    I'm trying to go spoiler free, but I think someone should post the actual concert start time in Vancouver so people know what's going on.
    It would be great if they actually start at 8 for all concerts!
    (the Vancouver topic and the site counter assumes U2 starts at 8, all the timings at the top)