Originally posted by blueeyedboy:[..]
it's all preference. vinyl is not for everyone, and i get that. especially the ripping part. to my ears though, both formats still have a bigger sound than mp3. (although, mp3 is the convenient format for playlists around the house and on the road)
the funny thing is, when cd's were first coming out (i'm dating myself, lol) and i was getting ready to move to another state, i sold all my vinyl and replaced it all with the "compact"... now, i'm trying to replace all that vinyl, and it's costing me 3-4 times what I paid for the records brand new, in most cases. crazy...
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
I do opt for the convenience route more often than not now. I think my ears just aren’t trained enough to hear much of a difference between the formats so I just play it in the way that’s easiest. I still like to have a physical item though. I would probably say vinyl is the more impressive physical item than cd but the fact that it doesn’t really act as a back up for the digital tracks like the cd can is an issue for me. If I came into loads of money I’d probably have a u2 vinyl collection as well just to have the best of all worlds lol.
Originally posted by Welsh_Edge:CD's are cheaper to produce than vinyl?
Especially for a big release like this. Big as in the number of tracks.
Originally posted by SJKamal:LiveNation wants to go the "cheap route". They want to make as much money as they can - like any business would. This seems like quite a popular gift, so putting it on CD which is much cheaper than vinyl makes perfect sense.
Originally posted by Welsh_Edge:"Complete live recording catalog"
When the shows are basically the same throughout the tour with very few changes from show to show? They just release one show that covers the whole thing.