GEN
Active topics
  6. Originally posted by yeah:[..]

    You already said it yourself: You are guessing that some kind of overproducing is the reason for the delay. But nobody knows if that's true. So why getting mad already?


    Smartass

    No, but you know what I mean: if the reason for the delay is working too much on the songs, then I'm pissed off.
  7. Pop = best album? And Zooropa? Only my money's worth, but fuck off are they the best lol...perhaps they can be considered sonically adventurous and inventive, but that doesn't equate to best in my books. JT and Achtung Baby are superior in my opinion, because they work as musical entities and they all keep a staple theme successfully. Pop could have been one of the great albums, but it didn't take off, and Zooropa's just, well, it's experimental music, like Pink Floyd with a touch of Edge madness. I do still love the latter 2, but I think there's a reason why JT and AB are (and rightly so) more celebrated works.
  8. Originally posted by WojBhoy:Pop = best album? And Zooropa? Only my money's worth, but fuck off are they the best lol...perhaps they can be considered sonically adventurous and inventive, but that doesn't equate to best in my books. JT and Achtung Baby are superior in my opinion, because they work as musical entities and they all keep a staple theme successfully. Pop could have been one of the great albums, but it didn't take off, and Zooropa's just, well, it's experimental music, like Pink Floyd with a touch of Edge madness. I do still love the latter 2, but I think there's a reason why JT and AB are (and rightly so) more celebrated works.


    well actually you're very right. AB and JT are superior albums. Pop and Zooropa are non ''U2''-records, and that's what it makes them the best of U2 for me. It's just the famous rockband taking an different route with their music and experimenting etc. The results are just... rocking.
  9. Originally posted by WojBhoy:Pop = best album? And Zooropa? Only my money's worth, but fuck off are they the best lol...perhaps they can be considered sonically adventurous and inventive, but that doesn't equate to best in my books. JT and Achtung Baby are superior in my opinion, because they work as musical entities and they all keep a staple theme successfully. Pop could have been one of the great albums, but it didn't take off, and Zooropa's just, well, it's experimental music, like Pink Floyd with a touch of Edge madness. I do still love the latter 2, but I think there's a reason why JT and AB are (and rightly so) more celebrated works.


    You have an uncanny knack for saying exactly what I'm thinking.
  11. I noticed this recently when on iTunes 8 with Genius; not sure if anyone's ever seen it before. Take a look in the top-right-hand corner, under Search.

    New album released 09/30/08?



    The things you notice...don't worry about what's playing.
  12. Originally posted by dieder:well actually you're very right. AB and JT are superior albums. Pop and Zooropa are non ''U2''-records, and that's what it makes them the best of U2 for me. It's just the famous rockband taking an different route with their music and experimenting etc. The results are just... rocking.

    I think I know where you're coming from even if it doesn't quite click with me - do you essentially mean you prefer Pop and Zooropa because they're not classic U2 albums?

    @ Aussie - great minds think alike
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.