Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3:Here's the deal with setlist rotation...we talk about this all the time. A realistic want would be to hope that U2 would have two or three slots in the setlist that they would rotate. You're simply never going to see U2 put on the type of show they've been putting on for the last 20 years now with a rotating setlist. There are too many things that need coordinated.
Can you imagine if they started pulling audibles on the 360 crew? It would be like if you went to see Hamlet and made the actors start performing Romeo and Juliet halfway through. The set would be wrong, the lighting cues would be completely off, and the characters would more than likely be forgetting parts.
U2 shows are great because they're productions. It's more than just a setlist. Frankly- and I love Pearl Jam, seen them live and they are one of my favorites- but there is absolutely nothing to that show but music. And that's fine, nobody wants anything more than that from them. But U2 has a reputation as the greatest live band in the world, and that's not something they're going to let go of.
Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3:I forgot to add that yes, the songs can be rehearsed with the crew and they can be forced to know what's going to happen, but more often than not at a Pearl Jam show (for example), the setlist is written minutes before taking the stage. I swear I've read a quote by Stone Gossard before where he said he doesn't necessarily know what he's playing until he hits the stage. You can't do that when you employ such a population to run your show for you - its too much to coordinate.
Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3:Oh absolutely, I don't mean to say that it wouldn't be. What I would enjoy even just as much is the same 24 songs in completely different orders each night. Experiment more, take longer to find a "theme" for the show, and don't settle for one good flow that you get out of a show and repeat it 50 times. Shake it up, Totally throw us off!
Originally posted by EyesWithPrideB3:Here's the deal with setlist rotation...we talk about this all the time. A realistic want would be to hope that U2 would have two or three slots in the setlist that they would rotate. You're simply never going to see U2 put on the type of show they've been putting on for the last 20 years now with a rotating setlist. There are too many things that need coordinated.
Can you imagine if they started pulling audibles on the 360 crew? It would be like if you went to see Hamlet and made the actors start performing Romeo and Juliet halfway through. The set would be wrong, the lighting cues would be completely off, and the characters would more than likely be forgetting parts.
U2 shows are great because they're productions. It's more than just a setlist. Frankly- and I love Pearl Jam, seen them live and they are one of my favorites- but there is absolutely nothing to that show but music. And that's fine, nobody wants anything more than that from them. But U2 has a reputation as the greatest live band in the world, and that's not something they're going to let go of.
Originally posted by Genaro92U2:I don't mind COBL and Vertigo played every night again, same with BD... but that's about it from the 2000's that are "warhorses" LOL
Elevation, Stuck and Walk On need to not ALL be at the show at once IMO, switch them up. How bout some When I Look at the World or Original of the Species?