MUS
Active topics

  1. One can easily miss a post being made in a thread that's constantly updated with news, bootlegs shared, photos, videos and all. There's little or nothing wrong in repeating, it happens constantly on the U2 news related topics and nobody accuses those who re-post of "cluttering". Re-posting one image isn't comparable with posting loads of 60-lines-long bootlegs each day - something that's very praiseworthy, but can be annoying for those trying to follow a discussion. Oh, by the way, this single's cover was posted in small size, with no concrete release date attached. So it's hardly "cluttering", more like "updating". There you go!

    PS. The page number depends on how many posts per page you choose to view; I have 20 posts per page so it's page 229 for me.
  2. Excited for some new material.
  3. Yeah, new Springsteen is always great Specially if it means new chances of seeing him live.
  5. Originally posted by KleWdSide:Ahhhh, good ole' Casino Nancy. Greasy Lake's pet. If you dare to disagree with her & call her out on her bitchy behavior, you'll get banned.

    Just like BTX, it's full of NS81s kool aid drinkers
  6. I really hope those rumours I posted earlier today are true, can you guys find it?

    Tracks 2 and a new album would be sweet.
  7. Regarding the cluttering. Isn't there a spoiler box that could be used for long lists? Because I do agree it's a bit annoying sometimes. Sorry if this has already been mentioned.
  8. Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]

    One can easily miss a post being made in a thread that's constantly updated with news, bootlegs shared, photos, videos and all. There's little or nothing wrong in repeating, it happens constantly on the U2 news related topics and nobody accuses those who re-post of "cluttering". Re-posting one image isn't comparable with posting loads of 60-lines-long bootlegs each day - something that's very praiseworthy, but can be annoying for those trying to follow a discussion. Oh, by the way, this single's cover was posted in small size, with no concrete release date attached. So it's hardly "cluttering", more like "updating". There you go!

    PS. The page number depends on how many posts per page you choose to view; I have 20 posts per page so it's page 229 for me.

    has no one told you size doesn't matter - it's what you do with it
  10. Originally posted by Mr_Trek:Regarding the cluttering. Isn't there a spoiler box that could be used for long lists? Because I do agree it's a bit annoying sometimes. Sorry if this has already been mentioned.

    Sure, spoiler tags should be used for that too, not only for hiding "sensitive" info.
  11. Originally posted by Mr_Trek:Regarding the cluttering. Isn't there a spoiler box that could be used for long lists? Because I do agree it's a bit annoying sometimes. Sorry if this has already been mentioned.

    i wouldn't worry about it i've already said i won't be posting anymore bootsin any section which is a shame because there is still a monumental amount to go that haven't been around before
  12. This is really starting to get pathetic now
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.
Contribute to the U2 community with uploading photos or by telling us which shows you have visited.