Originally posted by Bloodraven:Since everybody sees things different, it's impossible to know how everybody sees something, but as a long time U2 fan who just recently discovered this whole world of bootlegs (and I really don't think I'm in the minority among U2 fans in this regard), I don't believe people is that aware of what represents a "rarity"...
How many fans would have a collection consisting of no more than something like Red Rocks + ZooTV Sydney + Elevation Slane + 360 Rose Bowl (just 3-5 live shows) besides whatever number of studio albums (maybe only the most well known ones)?... I'd guess that that's the majority of fans.
That would mean that they'd have a rather distorted view of what can be considered a "rarity".
Take Ultraviolet for instance... I'd say it'd be common for many fans to listen Achtung Baby regularly and check the Sydney show every once in a while... for all those fans Ultraviolet is/was far from a "rarity".
Just the same way that they don't care how many times some songs have been played in the last 20 years... they're not listening to them (unlike us) every single day in a couple of bootlegs.
My definition of "live rarities" would be either songs never played regularly before, or songs not played recently from the early 80's. Anything from The Joshua Tree onwards that has been played with some regularity in any tour wouldn't really surprise me.
(obviously this is the way I feel about it, I know that most likely everybody in here feels way different about it, but I just wanted to say it)
(this also has to do with getting old... I think of the 90's as if it had happened rather recently, and I see anything from the new millenium as brand new, so I struggle to feel the time gap between tours)