Originally posted by tui[..]
Its that the same for cats and other species aswell? used as a general term?
Reading over that little convo was very interesting, when i was doing work experience the nurse always told me that some owners find it so hard to believe that their beloved pets can develop cancer or have heart disease or diabetes, they think "but those are humans diseases" you know?
it really suprises me,
I think you could argue that it's because for most of the world, we aren't made aware of diseases in the rest of the animal kingdom unless it holds some risk for humans too (e.g. avian flu, rabies etc.), whereas because stuff like cancer (shameful as it is to say)* is a big issue due to its financial and life-threatening implications it has on society as a whole, we're always being made aware of its existence.
*I mean shameful because I'm considering the financial aspect aswell as the risk to one's mortality, which I dislike because I think life should be held to value regardless of monetary cost, although unfortunately in this day and age it's difficult to make distinctions between the 2

cheers Dan, point taken - in fairness I wasn't 100% certain with regard to what other word to use - I had pondered "to develop" but I thought I go ahead with my original intentions, wrong or otherwise - you learn from your mistakes, is it not said? 

)
I'm off for real this time
